Technical Workshop 5: Policy Mapping & Effective Instruments for GHG Mitigation in Urban Transport (Washington, DC)

This workshop provided an opportunity to discuss possible GHG mitigation instruments suitable for addressing mitigation from the transport sector. Countries and private sector representatives shared experience.
Date:
Mar 14, 2013
Venue:
Washington, DC
March 14, 2013 | ||
8:30 | Registration | |
1. Opening and Introduction | ||
9:00 | ||
Mary Barton-Dock, World Bank | ||
Xueman Wang, PMR Secretariat | ||
2. Policy Mapping: Identifying GHG Mitigation Policy Instruments Interaction and Overlap | ||
As countries identify and implement various policy instruments to scale up mitigation−including carbon pricing instruments−an important consideration is how such instrument may interact or overlap with other related policies, such as those addressing energy efficiency and renewable energy. Understanding this interaction is critical to the design and effectiveness of any climate change mitigation instrument. The first part introduced policy mapping, presenting approaches, lessons learnt, and roles of supplementary instruments. In the second part, Australia, California, and Norway shared their experience of policy mapping and assessment when designing various instruments. In the third part, China, South Africa, and South Korea presented their experiences from policy interactions. |
||
9:15 | ||
Felix Matthes, Öko Institut | ||
Approaches and Lessons Learned | ||
Ian Parry, IMF | ||
IMF Carbon Mitigation Policy | ||
9:45 | ||
Jessica Allen, Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency, Australia | ||
Australia: Framework for Mitigation Policy | ||
Edie Chang, Air Resources Board | ||
California: Global Warming Solutions Act | ||
Sveinung Kvalø, Ministry of Environment, Norway | ||
Norway: Policy Mapping | ||
10:45 | Break | |
11:00 | ||
Zheng Shuang, National Center for Climate Change Strategy and International Cooperation, China | ||
China: ETS - Policies and Challenges | ||
Yong Gun Kim, Korea Environment Institute, South Korea | ||
South Korea: Mitigation Policy Map and Interaction Issues | ||
Mpho Legote, National Treasury, South Africa | ||
South Africa: Policy Interaction Experience | ||
12:30 | Lunch | |
3. Effective Instruments for the Domestic Transport Sector | ||
In this session, participants discussed how carbon market instruments, alone or combined with other policies and incentives, can play a role in urban transport. There was an overview of applying policy instruments in domestic transport sectors followed by key challenges using market-based instruments. In addition, EU, California, and Switzerland shared their experience from inclusion/exclusion of the transport sector in ETSs. Moreover, three companies presented their perspectives. |
||
14:00 | ||
Chair: Holger Dalkmann, EMBARQ | ||
Andreas Kopp, World Bank | ||
Applying Policy Instruments for the Domestic Transport Sector | ||
Carlos Pardo, Advisor to Government of Colombia | ||
Colombia: Experience with Crediting Mechanisms in Transport | ||
Hilda Martinez, CTS EMBARQ Mexico | ||
Mexico: Experience with Crediting Mechanisms in Transport | ||
Alexandrina Plotanova-Oquab, World Bank | ||
Global Perspecitive of the Use of Crediting Mechanisms in the Domestic Transport Sector | ||
15:30 | Break | |
15:45 | ||
Vicky Pollard, DG Climate Action, European Commission | ||
EU: ETS & Domestic Transport | ||
Edie Chang, Air Resources Board, California | ||
California: Transportation Fuels in the Cap | ||
Jürg Grütter, Grütter Consulting | ||
Switzerland: Transport and Emission Trading | ||
16:45 | ||
Andreas Klugescheid, VP, BMW California Office | ||
BMW: Cap and Trade in the Transport Sector | ||
Giles Dickson, VP Environmental Policies & Global Advocacy, Alstom | ||
Alstom: Perspectives on Policy Instruments for GHG Mitigation in Domestic Transport | ||
Luis Casado, Director, Carbon and Environmental Footprint Unit, Repsol | ||
Repsol: Perspective on Policy Instruments for GHG Mitigation | ||
18:00 | Wrap up | |
End of workshop | ||